A. The article talked about different situations and examples of when photoshop was used when it shouldn't have or when it went too far. He also told of what happened to the people that made those photoshop fiascos.
B. I think photoshop should not be used at all unless it is EXTREMELY necessary. The people that use these photoshops just want their photo to look really good and they will do anything to get that. They should focus more when photos are being taken so they can get what they want without doing a ridiculous amount of photoshop. Some cases were just stupid of why they used photoshop. If something goes wrong with the subject of what you are shooting you have to work with what you got. You can't change what happened.
A.
I thought this was the most unethical. This photo for one doesn't look very real. Clinton and Castro both knew there weren't cameras there. For the press, instead of finding some other way to make a front cover they cut and pasted a photo. I don't understand the point in making this cover anyway because there were no cameras there when they met so this photo is not worth it.
B.
This seemed the most ethical out of all of them. This is a really good photo to use for a front cover, especially for National Geographic. This makes sense because they got a really good photo and they needed a way to fit the scene on the magazine. This one doesn't seem bad at all to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment